Forum:Separating Footnotes and References: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
no edit summary
m (NateBumber moved page User:NateBumber/Sandbox/1 to Forum:Separating Footnotes and References without leaving a redirect)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|The Panopticon}}
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
== Proposal ==
== Proposal ==
As someone who loves using <nowiki><ref></nowiki> and {{tlx|reflist}} on this wiki, I've long noticed that our current usage mixes together two distinct purposes:
As someone who loves using <nowiki><ref></nowiki> and {{tlx|reflist}} on this wiki, I've long noticed that our current practice mixes together two distinct purposes:
#footnotes, i.e. explanatory or clarifying comments; and
#footnotes, i.e. explanatory or clarifying comments; and
#references, i.e. external links which serve as evidence for the claims, usually through {{tlx|cite web}}.
#references, i.e. external links which serve as evidence for the claims, usually through {{tlx|cite web}}.
emailconfirmed, Administrators
15,041

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.