Trusted
34,027
edits
Forum:Reforming Tardis:Video policy: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Reforming Tardis:Video policy (edit)
Revision as of 04:54, 10 September 2023
, 10 September 2023no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
::: Linking to ''official'' material is clearly acceptable, yes (imo). Linking to unofficial material runs into precisely the issue discussed. And it's a real headache, but it's Fandom ToU. We could, potentially, develop an in-house citation style for youtube reference works and ask spongebob. Or specifically ask spongebob just generically about this issue. But, you know, as the ToU is written it's technically a violation if this stuff isn't actually fair use. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC) | ::: Linking to ''official'' material is clearly acceptable, yes (imo). Linking to unofficial material runs into precisely the issue discussed. And it's a real headache, but it's Fandom ToU. We could, potentially, develop an in-house citation style for youtube reference works and ask spongebob. Or specifically ask spongebob just generically about this issue. But, you know, as the ToU is written it's technically a violation if this stuff isn't actually fair use. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: I think Bongo is absolutely on the mark here. If we have a page on something like ''[[Downtime – The Lost Years of Doctor Who]]'', allowing us to freely cite its contents, then why can't we have a way to cite YouTube documentaries? There must be a solution somehow. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 04:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
