Trusted
34,029
edits
Forum:Reforming Tardis:Video policy: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Post-fork
Tag: 2017 source edit |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
:::::I agree with this. I think we are overthinking way too much about what bad things could come from this that that we are stalling what could make the wiki so much better. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC) | :::::I agree with this. I think we are overthinking way too much about what bad things could come from this that that we are stalling what could make the wiki so much better. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
Those two things are ''often'' qualitatively distinct, in that many self described YouTube documentaries claim to be fair use but are not. (Again, the bar for commentary and criticism is stricter than what many people think it is.) Since something like Downtime ''isn't showing clips of copyrighted material'' it's going to be a lot easier for it to be kosher. | |||
Are we overthinking this? I mean. Maybe? It's not like Fandom pays us much attention unless they want something from us. But it ''is'' ToU, and the question of whether we can tacitly encourage users to violate ToU is actually pretty important. If there ever ''is'' an issue, I could imagine this policy change being pointed to as a reason to take a heavier hand. | |||
Again, if you want, I can ask Spongebob or Czech. We can work up some wording that tries to push back the responsibility of everything involved being fair use on the uploader of the documentary/person claiming fair use (and we might specifically say that you still can't link to material that's copyrighted outside of claims of fair use, idk, we can decide on that), and that if the copyright holder wishes the link removed they need only contact an admin, and we can try asking if that's okay. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
: I asked Spongebob (off-wiki via Discord, although I'm sure he'd be happy to verify on-wiki) about linking to fan documentaries and the like. This was the response I received: | |||
{{quote|Hey! Linking to the videos wouldn't be an issue our end as we're not hosting them - YouTube are. If a video is taken down from YouTube, then the YouTube embed or link won't display the video. | |||
Clearly we'd prefer you didn't link to YouTube videos containing full episodes that are illegally uploaded, but clips, fan documentaries etc will be fine. I would bear in mind that if we're asked to take them down by the Copyright holder, we would have to honor that though.|[[User:Spongebob456|Spongebob456]]}} | |||
: This seems pretty clear-cut to me. [[User:Bongolium500|<span title="aka Bongolium500">Bongo50</span>]] [[User talk:Bongolium500|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
::/shrug/ Alright then. I'd probably still suggest writing up our policy in a way that pushes responsibility off of us. :P [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
::: Sounds good! This also opens the door to clips of episodes that fans have uploaded onto video sites that the BBC haven't, as the BBC rarely upload more than a handful of clips from a given episode on YT, especially of less... plot-relevant scenes (what immediately comes to mind is [[Muriel Frost]]'s appearance in the news, picked up on the [[TARDIS scanner]], when Nine, Rose, and Mickey are in the TARDIS while Jackie calls the police to report the Doctor, which no uploads exist of online). {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 19:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::: I'm thinking of if we should allow video uploads of cultural references. I think it we list, say, [[W:c:siivagunner:List of rips referencing media/Live-action#Doctor Who|references in the SiIvaGunner channel]] on one of the "[[Cultural references to the Doctor Who universe|Cultural references to the ''Doctor Who'' universe]]" pages (as that's what they are), it would be good to be able to embed at least one of the more notable ''DW''-themed uploads from the channel (also clips from other series where the reference is purely audio-based). [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:38, 17 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
I think it’s time we either revive discussion on this Forum debate or find a conclusion to it. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
:Still think we should allow video uploads from accounts that are not official as long as the videos make sense to have. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
:: I think our policy should be that we *prefer* offical uploads, and we absolutely discourage low-quality uploads that have only survived in the YouTube ecosystem for being of so poor quality (hazy edges, low frame-rate, etc). | |||
:: But given that FANDOM's policy is that we can imbed whatever we want, as imbedding is not uploading, I do think we should branch outside of "official" sources, especially for obscure things like, say, a ''Doctor Who'' Pinball instructional video. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 06:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
::: Is there any way that we can stop now, pass the resolution on non-admins uploading videos, and then continue this debate? This old rule is just seriously maddening and holding us back. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 20:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::: I support this suggestion. With the broadcast of {{cs|Wild Blue Yonder (TV story)}}, the Official Doctor Who YouTube channel has uploaded a bunch of new videos... which I can't upload. >:( {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 20:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
::::: If action could be taken on this forum thread, it would be appreciated as its scope effects the content of [[Forum:Video subpages]], as it would allow a greater selection of videos to be added to the proposed new subpage type. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 18:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
Agreed. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:So… if we could get this Forum debate up and running again, or if we could have it concluded, it would be great. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
::It’s time to get this thread going again. It’s been neglected way too long. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
=== Post-fork === | |||
So considering that a good amount of the above debate was dedicated to clarifying what FANDOM's policies on this issue are, it's perhaps now important to establish that we are no longer a FANDOM site. I'm sure our new host will have their own rules, but I can only imagine they will agree with us that linking to something is not the same thing as uploading it to our site. It would be without legal precedent for Tardis.Wiki to be sued by the BBC for embedding a clip we didn't upload, nor for linking to a clip in a discussion. | |||
Because of that - I now propose that we do away with the rule banning linking to online video websites. So in total, these are the rule suggestions I propose: | |||
* Anyone can "upload" videos to the new Wiki, as long as they do not break content rules (no nudity, etc). | |||
* Anyone can link to or at least reference the existence of videos on other sites, as long as the sites are PG and legal. | |||
This leaves a final point of contention. Should we only include official uploads? I think, given the circumstances, there is nothing wrong with occasionally embedding non-official uploads. If the videos are taken down, we can remove them from our pages. But I think that any resource, from the BBC or otherwise, that helps our casual readers understand these topics is wholly good. | |||
I do think we should have some standards, however. We should likely discourage channels that add watermarks or blur the footage to confuse copyright bots. Not Funny Family Guy Moments accounts. But at the very least, if I want to upload the official DW Pinball instructional video, stuff like that should be allowed. [[User:OttselSpy25|OttselSpy25]] [[User talk:OttselSpy25|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
: The PG aspect seems based on a misapprehension! We're in fact ''freer'' to discuss NSFW things than we were at Fandom, so long as it's properly tagged. (I understand more technologically-inclined people than I are working on a system to blur NSFW images by default which people could then click to un-blur at their discretion. I'm not sure it could extend to thumbnails, so I suppose videos with NSFW ''thumbnails'' might be prohibited…?… I can't imagine that would come up often, though, and you could certainly still link to them with the proper warnings.) [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Well that may be true, but I think on principle we should discourage people uploading the opening scene to ''[[Zygon: When Being You Just Isn't Enough]]''. [[User:OttselSpy25|OttselSpy25]] [[User talk:OttselSpy25|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::<s>Should we?</s> Well, that may be, but in any event NSFW does also cover things like gore/violence, of which we also have a fair bit here and there. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::: Honestly, I understand why it might seem smart to decline closing this forum until we'd have a post-fork consensus. But I think the average editor's likelihood of contributing to a debate this old is much lower than if we "forked" the thread itself. I think the best call right now would be for an admin to make final judgements on most, if not all, of the original opening talking points, with a post-fork sequel thread then being started. [[User:OttselSpy25|OttselSpy25]] [[User talk:OttselSpy25|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
