1,858
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
::::I don't really know. If anything, in online circles the term seems just as frequently used, if not moreso, to refer to ''wholly'' fictional constructs (e.g. "the Lovecraftian mythos"), relating it to mythopoeia. Insofar as a title which seems to come down on the side of God being an imaginary construct is deemed to be offensive, "(mythos)" might easily give that impression to the average reader more ''strongly'' than "(mythology)" would, connotations-wise. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 20:35, 9 May 2023 (UTC) | ::::I don't really know. If anything, in online circles the term seems just as frequently used, if not moreso, to refer to ''wholly'' fictional constructs (e.g. "the Lovecraftian mythos"), relating it to mythopoeia. Insofar as a title which seems to come down on the side of God being an imaginary construct is deemed to be offensive, "(mythos)" might easily give that impression to the average reader more ''strongly'' than "(mythology)" would, connotations-wise. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 20:35, 9 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
I think we should change it to [[God (individual)]] to be most clear, if nothing else. [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc|Cousin Ettolrahc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC) |
edits