Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,209
edits
User talk:BananaClownMan: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 623: | Line 623: | ||
{{quote|Going forward, '''an out-of-universe perspective should be favoured in all continuity sections if possible'''. This is a big ask, and although it's an ideal to trend towards I will not demand that we pull out all stops making valid stories' sections conform to this. However, given that we're going to be creating Continuity sections when none existed, I can and will ask that '''all continuity sections on invalid pages, and "continuity to non-valid sources" sections on valid or invalid pages, be written from an out-of-universe perspective'''. I think that ought to solve Czech's issue, to whatever extent it may have otherwise been a concern.|@[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]], [[Forum:Non-valid Continuity sections, categories, and prefixes]]}} | {{quote|Going forward, '''an out-of-universe perspective should be favoured in all continuity sections if possible'''. This is a big ask, and although it's an ideal to trend towards I will not demand that we pull out all stops making valid stories' sections conform to this. However, given that we're going to be creating Continuity sections when none existed, I can and will ask that '''all continuity sections on invalid pages, and "continuity to non-valid sources" sections on valid or invalid pages, be written from an out-of-universe perspective'''. I think that ought to solve Czech's issue, to whatever extent it may have otherwise been a concern.|@[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]], [[Forum:Non-valid Continuity sections, categories, and prefixes]]}} | ||
Here. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 12:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC) | Here. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 12:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: No, this is not correct. Real-world perspective is to be ''favoured'' in all continuity sections going forward. What I meant, though, is that editors didn't have to pull all the stops to get every section rewritten as a ''priority'' — that it's ''okay'' if some legacy ones remain in the old style until the changeover can be implemented (like with old-school citations vs. {{tlx|cite source}}), whereas all new continuity sections, including by definition all the ones for non-valid sources which didn't originally have such sections, ''must'' be written from a real-world perspective. Thanks for checking! --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 20:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
