Trusted
49,498
edits
User:Epsilon/Canon: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| data-sort-value="1 January 1999" | [[1999 (releases)|1999]]+ | | data-sort-value="1 January 1999" | [[1999 (releases)|1999]]+ | ||
| "''As far as the BBC is concerned, these new stories are seen as part of the official Doctor Who canon.''"<ref>[[DWM 275]]</ref> | | "''As far as the BBC is concerned, these new stories are seen as part of the official Doctor Who canon.''"<ref>[[DWM 275]]</ref> | ||
|- | |||
| ''[[Time Crash (TV story)|Time Crash]]'' | |||
| TV | |||
| ''[[Children in Need]]'' | |||
| {{sortname|Steven|Moffat}} | |||
| [[16 November (releases)|16 November]] [[2007 (releases)|2007]] | |||
| [[DWM]]: "''Is it canon?''"<br>[[Steven Moffat|SM]]: "''Oh.'' [Laughs] ''Yes, absolutely. Time Crash empatically happens within the... well, people can make up their own minds about what's canon, but it's intended by us to actually happen... unless if you don't want it to.''"<ref>Some 2007 issue of [[DWM]]</ref><ref>[https://twitter.com/DrWhoMoment/status/1695873832014201021 @DrWhoMoment on twitter.com]</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ''[[The Adventure Games]]'' | | ''[[The Adventure Games]]'' | ||
| Line 60: | Line 67: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
<center><font size="5">Long story short, only a few random things have been called canonical, and even then, mostly in either unserious situations and/or the person saying it also admitting that canon is subjective anyway. Again, don't take this list seriously.</font></center> | |||
== Footnotes == | == Footnotes == | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
[[Category:User:Epsilon the Eternal]] | [[Category:User:Epsilon the Eternal]] | ||
