Trusted
8,473
edits
Tardis:User rights nominations: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Comments and concerns
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
====Comments and concerns==== | ====Comments and concerns==== | ||
:'''Do you have specific concerns about this user that are getting in the way of you making up your mind? Leave them here for the nominee to address.''' To the nominee: failure to respond to comments left here may weigh against you when it comes time to close the nomination. | :'''Do you have specific concerns about this user that are getting in the way of you making up your mind? Leave them here for the nominee to address.''' To the nominee: failure to respond to comments left here may weigh against you when it comes time to close the nomination. | ||
I have two (well, three) main lines of questioning here. Certainly Nate is qualified in terms of his editing experience, there can be no doubt about that. | |||
*To what extent should the wiki enshrine in policy ambiguity? I mean this in two senses, first, if we simply despair of the notion that we can find hard and fast lines to draw, do we always default to vague ones? Do we default to these even if we don't spend weeks or months trying to rigorously find lines we all can agree on? Secondly, do we wish to enshrine ambiguity to preserve the ability for people to edit in different ways based on different aesthetic preferences, different views on how the wiki should operate? We've had a very noticeable shift in active admin composition over the past few years. And I'd never accuse anyone of knowingly participating in an echo chamber in the past, present or future, least of all Nate. But to what extent should we actively put in place guardrails to mitigate against such things? Are our current rules sufficient? | |||
*Do you feel confident that you won't be stretched too thin? You mention ''many'' areas where you moderate, and you have fingers in other pies as well. Not to mention real life (/shudder/). You're your own best judge, but I do think it's worth making sure of. Especially as it concerns closing forum threads. (/Glances at [[Forum:Rule 4 by Proxy and its ramifications: considered in the light of the forum archives]] and weeps/) | |||
[[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Bureaucrats == | == Bureaucrats == | ||
