Trusted
49,498
edits
Talk:Thirteenth Doctor's forced regeneration: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Talk:Thirteenth Doctor's forced regeneration (edit)
Revision as of 21:19, 21 November 2023
, 21 November 2023no edit summary
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
:We'll certainly have to use {{tlx|conjecture}}. How about "Following the [[Thirteenth Doctor]]'s [[forced regeneration]], '''the [[Spy Master]], as "the Doctor"''', did XYZ…" or even just "the [[Spy Master]], calling himself '''"the Doctor"'''"? – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 19:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC) | :We'll certainly have to use {{tlx|conjecture}}. How about "Following the [[Thirteenth Doctor]]'s [[forced regeneration]], '''the [[Spy Master]], as "the Doctor"''', did XYZ…" or even just "the [[Spy Master]], calling himself '''"the Doctor"'''"? – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 19:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: Haven't read all of the discussion but I must object to the usage of "the Master-Doctor" based on script alone; the officially released script for ''Power'' contains a number of discrepancies with the final product, with versions of Cybermen and the fates of characters being changed around. In my eyes, this script is wholly unreliable and should not be used — even conjecturally in the Wiki sense of the term — to name anything. If we decide to have a page on the entity, and another source, even if it just marketing, uses the name, sure, it has merit in being used. But based upon that script? I don't believe it's reliable enough. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 21:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
