User talk:BananaClownMan: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→‎Recent edits: new section
(→‎Re: Twice adapted: new section)
(→‎Recent edits: new section)
Line 637: Line 637:


Hi. Yep, I can add new fields to infoboxes. I've added <tt>|adapted into2=</tt> to {{tlx|Infobox Story SMW}} (I have not added it to {{tlx|Infobox Story}} as the eventual aim to phase out that template and rename {{tlx|Infobox Story SMW}} to {{tlx|Infobox Story}}). Let me know if there are any issues or if there's anything else you'd like me to add. [[User:Bongolium500|<span title="aka Bongolium500">Bongo50</span>]] [[User talk:Bongolium500|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:09, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Yep, I can add new fields to infoboxes. I've added <tt>|adapted into2=</tt> to {{tlx|Infobox Story SMW}} (I have not added it to {{tlx|Infobox Story}} as the eventual aim to phase out that template and rename {{tlx|Infobox Story SMW}} to {{tlx|Infobox Story}}). Let me know if there are any issues or if there's anything else you'd like me to add. [[User:Bongolium500|<span title="aka Bongolium500">Bongo50</span>]] [[User talk:Bongolium500|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:09, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
== Recent edits ==
Looking into your recent edits and edit summaries, please use the edit summaries for edit summaries, not to engage in discussions regarding the edits, and / or the preceding editors' edits. Put that on the page's talk page or create a forum topic if it's got a wider wiki-concern.
Don't try to engage in an edit war with the edit summaries, there's better places to engage in discussion regarding these matters, if it's a matter of a more recent article engage an admin and the page can be locked to prevent editing until the vexing issue is resolved. Consider if you're an editor who is wading through edit summaries trying to determine what has been changed to the article itself, the edit summaries should help as a 'what's changed' log.
Policies and rules are what hold together this wiki's pages and policies. While admin's words and statements are a good place to start, they should be backed up by policies, talk pages and forum discussions. Citing an admin can be the start, it should follow that there's a policy, talk page or forum discussion that supports that statement. And if there isn't then it should be brought to the forums or a talk page to establish or clarify this situation. I acknowledge that there was a period when we didn't have good forums that would allow for this. But as we do now, that is the path that should be taken to establish matters. —[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 01:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Suppressors, Administrators
68,596

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.