292
edits
Forum:BBC writer's comics 3.0: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Discussion
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
::::I knew that thread was gonna bite us in the ass. Yeah, still not sure, is my position. I'm not a hard no. Just saying that my position is more ambiguous than it was previously in the earlier discussion. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC) | ::::I knew that thread was gonna bite us in the ass. Yeah, still not sure, is my position. I'm not a hard no. Just saying that my position is more ambiguous than it was previously in the earlier discussion. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::::I lean towards validity however not strongly. I feel it passes the rules but r2 I feel is inherently flawed as Aquanafranudy has said the BBC is not a commercial entity. And what exactly do we mean by commercial? Released for money would discount every Doctor who TV story as you get them all under a TV license which to watch TV you have to have so all TV Who is noncommercial so should we only cover the Books, the Comics and the audios? I think Rule 2 needs an update sooner rather than latter. [[User:Anastasia Cousins|Anastasia Cousins]] [[User talk:Anastasia Cousins|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:06, 6 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
