Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/The Star Beast: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/The Star Beast (edit)
Revision as of 14:54, 7 December 2023
, 7 December 2023no edit summary
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
**Perhaps the double dagger drive has a temporal drive element to it; or, at least, uses technology that one-and-a-half Time Lords, working together, can turn into a rudimentary one in order to undo the damage it was doing to Earth; hence, the cracks were "un-happened" when the power was reversed. Either that or at least one alien invasion has left Transport for London in possession of some very efficient street maintenance nanotech. | **Perhaps the double dagger drive has a temporal drive element to it; or, at least, uses technology that one-and-a-half Time Lords, working together, can turn into a rudimentary one in order to undo the damage it was doing to Earth; hence, the cracks were "un-happened" when the power was reversed. Either that or at least one alien invasion has left Transport for London in possession of some very efficient street maintenance nanotech. | ||
*** I haven't read it, but apparently [[PROSE]]: {{cs|The Star Beast (novelisation)}} does assert that the effects of the dagger drive being reverted makes little sense. I expect this will be clarified in near future. | *** I haven't read it, but apparently [[PROSE]]: {{cs|The Star Beast (novelisation)}} does assert that the effects of the dagger drive being reverted makes little sense. I expect this will be clarified in near future. | ||
Why does the Doctor say he was scientific adviser number 1? Shouldn't that actually be [[Liz Shaw]]? She was employed by UNIT as adviser before the Doctor was. | |||
