Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,451
edits
Talk:The Power of Three dating controversy: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Talk:The Power of Three dating controversy (edit)
Revision as of 23:25, 7 December 2023
, 7 December 2023→Excessive information
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
We do NOT need a full laundry list of ages and how far in the future and past Venice and Starship UK are to note that Amy's time is simply described as 2010 and 2011. Especially when the point of contention is about series 7-9, not series 5 and 6. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 23:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC) | We do NOT need a full laundry list of ages and how far in the future and past Venice and Starship UK are to note that Amy's time is simply described as 2010 and 2011. Especially when the point of contention is about series 7-9, not series 5 and 6. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 23:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Wholeheartedly disagree that huge removals after an arbitrary limit of words or bytes should be prohibited in of themselves. This isn't page blanking or even removing any section, it's reducing redundancy and/or speculation and/or waffle. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 23:19, 7 December 2023 (UTC) | : Wholeheartedly disagree that huge removals after an arbitrary limit of words or bytes should be prohibited in of themselves. This isn't page blanking or even removing any section, it's reducing redundancy and/or speculation and/or waffle. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 23:19, 7 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: Thorough listing of all possiblities permitted by the text is not "waffle" and every edit I have seen from you which you have justified using that word has been wrong-headed. Please reexamine your notion of relevance and understand that it does not correspond to this Wiki's much more inclusive standard. Information which is not actively fictitious/misleading should ''not'', as a general rule, be removed from a page, even if it's not ''crucial''. | |||
:: I don't have time to read through all your edits just now, so possibly ''some'' of your removals were justified, but I have seen enough wrongful deletions to see that not all were, and it's much much more serious to have some missing information than some redundancies, hence the reversions. Feel free to defend individual points you think should be removed here, but please do not edit the page yourself again to make such changes until this is resolved. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 23:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
