68,299
edits
Forum:Discontinuity revisited: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
→Formatting
m (→Formatting) |
|||
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
::On the Cold Blood page it seems to be an issue with people failing to indent enough. | ::On the Cold Blood page it seems to be an issue with people failing to indent enough. | ||
:Having bullet points for each point of discussion helps to keep track of which point of contention is being discussed. If every counter-argument had a bullet point the discussion would get somewhat out of control as every bullet point would signify that comment as a 'main' discontinuity element rather than an discussion about it. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 09:32, June 1, 2010 (UTC) | ::Having bullet points for each point of discussion helps to keep track of which point of contention is being discussed. If every counter-argument had a bullet point the discussion would get somewhat out of control as every bullet point would signify that comment as a 'main' discontinuity element rather than an discussion about it. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 09:32, June 1, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::I try to go through and fix things up when people indent incorrectly (or add bullets where they shouldn't, or insert colons later in the comment apparently trying to follow the instructions without understanding how wikicode works), but refrigamator messy, so so messy. Almost nobody is getting this right. | :::I try to go through and fix things up when people indent incorrectly (or add bullets where they shouldn't, or insert colons later in the comment apparently trying to follow the instructions without understanding how wikicode works), but refrigamator messy, so so messy. Almost nobody is getting this right. | ||
