Doctor Who and the Visitation (novelisation): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
trying to simplify the awkward Author, Writing and Publishing Notes header
m (Sentence case per TARDIS:Manual of Style#Headings Deviations)
m (trying to simplify the awkward Author, Writing and Publishing Notes header)
Line 39: Line 39:
* ''To be added''
* ''To be added''


==Author, Writing and Publishing Notes==
==Writing and publishing notes==
* The first book in the range to feature the use of a photographic cover.
* The first book in the range to feature the use of a photographic cover.
* There are two rumours around the reason for this; Firstly that [[Peter Davison]]’s agent rejected the proposed artwork by ([[David McAllister]]) on the grounds of it showing a poor likeness to his client, and secondly, that in an attempt to tie the range of novelisations more closely with a new season and a new Doctor on television, photographs were a way of revamping the range. The latter seems more likely, as a deliberate change of policy, bearing in mind that the decision to use photographs was extended to subsequent releases for a short time.
* There are two rumours around the reason for this; Firstly that [[Peter Davison]]’s agent rejected the proposed artwork by ([[David McAllister]]) on the grounds of it showing a poor likeness to his client, and secondly, that in an attempt to tie the range of novelisations more closely with a new season and a new Doctor on television, photographs were a way of revamping the range. The latter seems more likely, as a deliberate change of policy, bearing in mind that the decision to use photographs was extended to subsequent releases for a short time.
Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
765,429

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.