Trusted
19,588
edits
66 Seconds (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 292: | Line 292: | ||
:::: I'm not sold on the specific crop of #29, as most of the other proposed images are in 16:9 or 4:3 aspect ratios, while #29 is close to 1:1 but not ''quite'', which I feel leads to inconsistencies with other images. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 17:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC) | :::: I'm not sold on the specific crop of #29, as most of the other proposed images are in 16:9 or 4:3 aspect ratios, while #29 is close to 1:1 but not ''quite'', which I feel leads to inconsistencies with other images. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 17:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::: I think the issue is that we require slightly more square, or even portrait images, in order to fit in the clothes and hair of a character without losing detail, that way the subject of the image remains easily recognisable to all. I find in images like #15 and #17, the subject just isn't recognisable to all viewers at thumbnail size. To me #29 - even if it's slightly taller than images we've been used to in the past - just does a better job of highlighting the subject than #28. I also quite like #26, but I agree that it's not ideal as it crops clothing at the neck. However, as Tennant is holding his head up tall in that image, it would be hard to re-crop it - so as to include both clothing & hair, and remain recognisable - without making it portrait. [[User:66 Seconds|66 Seconds]] [[User talk:66 Seconds|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== first mentioned == | == first mentioned == |