68,299
edits
Forum:Discontinuity revisited: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Formatting
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 235: | Line 235: | ||
:::::I agree 100% that it should be "2.1" or "2A" or something similar (as I said, "outline format"). The problem is this wiki doesn't seem to have any way of doing that automatically. And I'm not sure we can expect people to do the numbering manually. It's pretty obvious to me that if I'm writing the first reply to 2.3, it should be 2.3.1--but is it going to be obvious to everyone else? --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 12:16, June 3, 2010 (UTC) | :::::I agree 100% that it should be "2.1" or "2A" or something similar (as I said, "outline format"). The problem is this wiki doesn't seem to have any way of doing that automatically. And I'm not sure we can expect people to do the numbering manually. It's pretty obvious to me that if I'm writing the first reply to 2.3, it should be 2.3.1--but is it going to be obvious to everyone else? --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 12:16, June 3, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::::No, you're right it's not going to be obvious to everyone else. That's also my primary concern in switching over to the number system. | |||
::::::Though just thinking on it from a different angle, what about having a horizontal line (<nowiki>----</nowiki>) between each of the discontinuity points? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:24, June 3, 2010 (UTC) | |||
