Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, threadmoderator
115,929
edits
Line 280: | Line 280: | ||
::: And I should note that, while the above is, in my view, the only sensible way forward, '''I do not endorse Season 23 (1963).''' That's quite simply not the same disambiguation: 1963 is disambiguating ''Doctor Who'', '''not''' the season. | ::: And I should note that, while the above is, in my view, the only sensible way forward, '''I do not endorse Season 23 (1963).''' That's quite simply not the same disambiguation: 1963 is disambiguating ''Doctor Who'', '''not''' the season. | ||
::: I suppose ''technically'' "Season 23 (1986 season)" could work, setting aside the repetition... However, this falls apart with BBC Wales. For a casual reader, the early seasons of all three RTD1 programmes came out close enough together that dabbing without series would spell pandemonium. | ::: I suppose ''technically'' "Season 23 (1986 season)" could work, setting aside the accessibility problem I laid out, -and the repetition... However, this falls apart with BBC Wales. For a casual reader, the early seasons of all three RTD1 programmes came out close enough together that dabbing without series would spell pandemonium. | ||
::: Leaving us with "Series 3 (2006 Doctor Who series). Or we could avoid that mess: "Series 3 (Doctor Who 2005)". Much better.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 09:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC) | ::: Leaving us with "Series 3 (2006 Doctor Who series). Or we could avoid that mess: "Series 3 (Doctor Who 2005)". Much better.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 09:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC) |
edits