581
edits
Forum:Adding "part of" to LOAs: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit |
JSmith5504 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::: Does look quite nice. I'm not sure about extending its use to something broader like "[Publisher]'s [X]th anniversary releases" or the like, though; I think that's if anything closer to a series than an anthology, it's a different meaning of "part of" altogether. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 22:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC) | ::: Does look quite nice. I'm not sure about extending its use to something broader like "[Publisher]'s [X]th anniversary releases" or the like, though; I think that's if anything closer to a series than an anthology, it's a different meaning of "part of" altogether. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 22:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::: Support this! Would propose switching the "Series" and "Part of" columns around — that would make most of the table go roughly* from "specific" to "broad" as you go from left to right, and I think that'd be more intuitive. (The currently proposed ordering is also ''particularly'' confusing for things like ''[[Short Trips (anthology)|Short Trips]]'' and ''[[The Tenth Doctor Chronicles (audio anthology)|The Tenth Doctor Chronicles]]'', which share a name with the series they're a part of.) | |||
:::: *It occasionally happens that a work is classified by the wiki as part of a series while the anthology it's published in ''isn't'' (see ''[[Horrors of Arcbeatle (anthology)|Horrors of Arcbeatle]]'' for examples), but most of the time — in my experience — they match up. | |||
:::: [[User:JSmith5504|jsmith5504]]<sup>[[User talk:JSmith5504|talk to me]]</sup> 10:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
