Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,202
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:::::: As foe why they are mostly television centric, that is to stop the very over citing problem you are referencing | :::::: As foe why they are mostly television centric, that is to stop the very over citing problem you are referencing | ||
::::: Soooooo they violate policy to avoid an issue? (Also, the bug has been fixed. But don't let that stop your cynicism.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | ::::: Soooooo they violate policy to avoid an issue? (Also, the bug has been fixed. But don't let that stop your cynicism.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
:: It's reasonable that citation for a fact shared by a large amounts of stories should, in most cases, be the first few stories to establish that fact — which in the case of a TV-originating character is going to tend to be his original TV era. For example, if I wanted to say "The First Doctor travelled in the TARDIS", I would cite that to "([[TV]]: {{cs|An Unearthly Child (TV story)}}, {{cs|The Daleks (TV story)}}, etc.)". I don't think this is in violation of T:NPOV; it's purely contextual. By no means should we end up with ''all-''TV in this section, though; surely there are points about the Doctor's personality which were first, or most clearly, established in non-TV sources. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |