Trusted
49,584
edits
Forum:Validity: An Adventure in Space and Time: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
m (→Discussion) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
::::''Fanboys'' is set within a larger anthology, so not analogous imo, it's automatically creating ''new'' DWU IP. (I did think about ''Fanboys'' as a possible counter example, but dismissed it for this reason.) Didn't comment on the Dalek Annuals stuff before b/c I forgot. My response is that it all falls under this basic idea, and AAiSaT doesn't. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | ::::''Fanboys'' is set within a larger anthology, so not analogous imo, it's automatically creating ''new'' DWU IP. (I did think about ''Fanboys'' as a possible counter example, but dismissed it for this reason.) Didn't comment on the Dalek Annuals stuff before b/c I forgot. My response is that it all falls under this basic idea, and AAiSaT doesn't. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::: And, for another point in support of keeping these on the same page: each section has a particular ''point''. The first section is to show an off-screen event, the second is to feature a character after the events of the story, and the third is to fix any sort of plot hole. Under a common theming of a time period or a character/actor, these stories set to do three very specific, very related things. They are 1000% not meant to be separate stories. The proposed split entirely goes against the content and format of the stories and is being ''entirely'' done to get around the thorny issue of one of these sections providing a monologue from a character we deem to be an invalid source — but as far as the story is concerned, each part is about characters played by [[William Russell]]. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 18:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
