Trusted
8,495
edits
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
In ''practice'' this has never really come up, people understand that sometimes hitting 4 or 5 reverts is contextually less bad than other times, and as a corollary upholding [[T:BOUND]] through one extra revert before calling it quits has never seemed to be an issue. But just on principle I think we should probably tweak them slightly. Say that one edit + 3 reverts vs 4 reverts constitutes an edit war, for instance. This is potentially something we may wish to not do, however, as it does run somewhat counter to the "be bold" directive in the current wording of [[T:BOUND]] and just sort of have as an operating procedure that if there's an explicit policy being violated (rather than just upholding the status quo of the page) one extra revert is fine. idk. It's just a weird small contradiction between two policies. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC) | In ''practice'' this has never really come up, people understand that sometimes hitting 4 or 5 reverts is contextually less bad than other times, and as a corollary upholding [[T:BOUND]] through one extra revert before calling it quits has never seemed to be an issue. But just on principle I think we should probably tweak them slightly. Say that one edit + 3 reverts vs 4 reverts constitutes an edit war, for instance. This is potentially something we may wish to not do, however, as it does run somewhat counter to the "be bold" directive in the current wording of [[T:BOUND]] and just sort of have as an operating procedure that if there's an explicit policy being violated (rather than just upholding the status quo of the page) one extra revert is fine. idk. It's just a weird small contradiction between two policies. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
I think it's safe to say that this idea never had any legs aside from my interest. If an admin wishes to close it, I have no objection. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 04:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC) | I think it's safe to say that this idea never had any legs aside from my interest. If an admin wishes to close it, (ideally without prejudice) I have no objection. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 04:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC) |