Forum:The LEGO Dimensions Conundrum, Reconsidered: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 589: Line 589:


: I'd just like to note that I mentioned ''Team Building'' earlier - I believe that one's actually built into the game, not a promo video. So if it's cited as its "own thing" (as some DLC levels may be), I wonder if it should be as a "(home video)"? As far as I recall, there's no interactive element in the story itself. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
: I'd just like to note that I mentioned ''Team Building'' earlier - I believe that one's actually built into the game, not a promo video. So if it's cited as its "own thing" (as some DLC levels may be), I wonder if it should be as a "(home video)"? As far as I recall, there's no interactive element in the story itself. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
:: Oh, something else, I feel like, assuming everything is covered (as that's my ideal outcome of this thread), we'd cover the main game as "LEGO Dimensions (video game)" with each level as a "namedpart" in cite source, while adventure worlds would be covered as stuff like "Adventure Time World (video game)". Level packs would be split in a similar fashion, although I'm unsure how story packs would be handled. The only thing I'm unsure of is how we'd cover the hub world, and how we'd cover the character/vehicle interactions and other misc. dialogue in the game. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)


== ''LEGO Dimensions'' validity discussion ==
== ''LEGO Dimensions'' validity discussion ==
Trusted
54,551

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.