Howling:River Song is a....... MAJOR SPOLIERS!!!: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Howling:River Song is a....... MAJOR SPOLIERS!!! (view source)
Revision as of 07:45, 2 July 2010
, 2 July 2010no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
::::Meanwhile, ''Lungbarrow'' has notoriously been ignored and flatly contradicted by the EDAs/PDAs and the new series. The later novels and TV episodes establish that the Doctor was born to a mother and a father, who he lived with, as did other Gallifreyans; he later married at least once and had at least two children, which was perfectly normal. (For that matter, even before Cartmel, the Fourth Doctor mentioned "Time Tots".) But Lungbarrow said that Gallifreyans are birthed fully-formed from Looms into a House of Cousins, and are sterile. So, when Lungbarrow says that the Other threw himself into the Looms and was later reconstituted as the First Doctor, how does that fit in? | ::::Meanwhile, ''Lungbarrow'' has notoriously been ignored and flatly contradicted by the EDAs/PDAs and the new series. The later novels and TV episodes establish that the Doctor was born to a mother and a father, who he lived with, as did other Gallifreyans; he later married at least once and had at least two children, which was perfectly normal. (For that matter, even before Cartmel, the Fourth Doctor mentioned "Time Tots".) But Lungbarrow said that Gallifreyans are birthed fully-formed from Looms into a House of Cousins, and are sterile. So, when Lungbarrow says that the Other threw himself into the Looms and was later reconstituted as the First Doctor, how does that fit in? | ||
:Most importantly, what does any of this have to do with any of the possibilities discussed in this thread? --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 03:36, June 11, 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Logbarrow must be the most intetionally contradictied thing in the history of Doctor Who, contradicited by the classic series, the new series, and everything else. It's so damn contradicted, whic the writers do on purpose. They're well aware of what it said, but continually throw in that the Doctor has family and has had sex. Also , this has nothing to do witb the subject. | |||
:River Song is... SPOILERS! Just that - she is River Song, nothing more, nothing less. She is who she is. [[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 19:35, June 30, 2010 (UTC) | |||
: | |||
:Personally, I don't believe that River Song kills the Doctor, as that would be too obvious, but I can't think of anyone else for her to kill. But she says "The greatest man I have ever known" could she know someone who she loves more than the doctor? I doubt that, but killing the Doctor would just be TOO obvious. | |||
: | |||
:i agree river song is rivers song and it wont be the doctor who she kills it will be too obvious, so obvious in fact the i get the feeling that it is what Moffat wants us to think she means. | |||
: | |||
:the death will have a big effect on the doctor though, she more or less said this at the end of the big bang and has the death got something to do with the dalek beging for mercy, because to make that happen must mean something [[Special:Contributions/217.23.232.194|217.23.232.194]] 07:45, July 2, 2010 (UTC) | |||
