9,297
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:Well...I can't really say which title to go for as we've got precedents on both sides of the court with regard to on-screen vs BBC given titles. | :Well...I can't really say which title to go for as we've got precedents on both sides of the court with regard to on-screen vs BBC given titles. | ||
:But the in-universe element does bring an issue of its own, do we present them as in-universe elements or as stories and acknowledge that they're used within an in-universe environment? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:22, October 27, 2010 (UTC) | :But the in-universe element does bring an issue of its own, do we present them as in-universe elements or as stories and acknowledge that they're used within an in-universe environment? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:22, October 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::How about if we move [[The Alien Files]] to "Sarah Jane's Alien Files," since of the two choices that title makes more semantic sense, and use a redirect for the logo's spelling. I further suggest using the [[Tardisode]] model for articles about the individual episodes, with brief summaries of what little story content there is, perhaps with "SJAF" as a prefix. We could then use an article at "Alien Files" for the in-universe element, with the standard disambiguating italics on top each to direct users to the other article. [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 09:10, October 28, 2010 (UTC) |
edits