Forum:Sarah Jane's Alien Files: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
:Well...I can't really say which title to go for as we've got precedents on both sides of the court with regard to on-screen vs BBC given titles.  
:Well...I can't really say which title to go for as we've got precedents on both sides of the court with regard to on-screen vs BBC given titles.  
:But the in-universe element does bring an issue of its own, do we present them as in-universe elements or as stories and acknowledge that they're used within an in-universe environment? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:22, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
:But the in-universe element does bring an issue of its own, do we present them as in-universe elements or as stories and acknowledge that they're used within an in-universe environment? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:22, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
::How about if we move [[The Alien Files]] to "Sarah Jane's Alien Files," since of the two choices that title makes more semantic sense, and use a redirect for the logo's spelling.  I further suggest using the [[Tardisode]] model for articles about the individual episodes, with brief summaries of what little story content there is, perhaps with "SJAF" as a prefix.  We could then use an article at "Alien Files" for the in-universe element, with the standard disambiguating italics on top each to direct users to the other article. [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 09:10, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
9,297

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.