Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Mindwarp: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
::We only see the altered version, and there is no need for us to go back and see how it all "really" happened. As explained during the story, much of what was shown is inaccurate. It either didn't happen at all or happened a different way.
::We only see the altered version, and there is no need for us to go back and see how it all "really" happened. As explained during the story, much of what was shown is inaccurate. It either didn't happen at all or happened a different way.
::The Master later claims that most of what was shown was true, so possibly, the beach interrogation took place as shown. However, the Valeyard might have chosen to omit mitigating evidence (such as the Doctor realising that the whole interrogation would be monitored by the Mentors, and thus not such a great opportunity for privately communicating with Peri as he might have intended).
::The Master later claims that most of what was shown was true, so possibly, the beach interrogation took place as shown. However, the Valeyard might have chosen to omit mitigating evidence (such as the Doctor realising that the whole interrogation would be monitored by the Mentors, and thus not such a great opportunity for privately communicating with Peri as he might have intended).
*Despite a specific reference to the sting on Kiv's new body, it never becomes a factor in the story - that is, no-one is stung by Kiv and no-one mentions the sting again. So why include it at all, or, if an instance of someone being stung was edited out, why not edit out this reference as well?
::Why would it have to be used just because it's referenced? This would only be an error if sometime later or before there was a contradictory reference.
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.