2
edits
Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Logopolis: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Logopolis (edit)
Revision as of 09:07, 8 December 2010
, 8 December 2010no edit summary
(fix formatting) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*It is never really explained how/why the Watcher has come into existence for this regeneration and not previous or future ones. | *It is never really explained how/why the Watcher has come into existence for this regeneration and not previous or future ones. | ||
::It's a process that is not always necessary. It's been rather clearly shown that the Doctor does not have the smoothest time with regeneration. Sometimes he needs a little help, even if from a future part of himself. | ::It's a process that is not always necessary. It's been rather clearly shown that the Doctor does not have the smoothest time with regeneration. Sometimes he needs a little help, even if from a future part of himself. | ||
:: | |||
*If the Watcher is the in-between point of the Doctor's regenerations and has foreknowledge of what will happen to Doctor #4, then why didn't he warn the Doctor against going to Logopolis in the first place? Knowing that the Master is stalking the Doctor and indulging in a totally random killing spree, and that the Master will follow the Doctor to Logopolis and set in motion a chain of events that will erase a portion of the universe and kill countless beings....why doesn't he try to prevent this from happening? | |||
*The lock on the Master's TARDIS changes place in part 1. | *The lock on the Master's TARDIS changes place in part 1. | ||
::A functioning chameleon circuit is more than capable of changing the location of the lock. | ::A functioning chameleon circuit is more than capable of changing the location of the lock. | ||
