emailconfirmed, Administrators
43,565
edits
Forum:Doctorwhospoilers.com is not a valid resource: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Doctorwhospoilers.com is not a valid resource (edit)
Revision as of 16:38, 29 March 2011
, 29 March 2011no edit summary
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:::It's impossible. I tried it last night and gave up. We should stop using Doctorwhospoilers from now on, and leave the current references as they are. If we have a Series 7, then we can take a much tougher look a references. If we were to remove the site form Series 6, we can't do it until we have sources for all the cast members. Rumours should stay as they are, as long as the source mentions an official site. In Summer, after part one of Series 6 is air, then we may discuss the references then. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 16:27, March 29, 2011 (UTC) | :::It's impossible. I tried it last night and gave up. We should stop using Doctorwhospoilers from now on, and leave the current references as they are. If we have a Series 7, then we can take a much tougher look a references. If we were to remove the site form Series 6, we can't do it until we have sources for all the cast members. Rumours should stay as they are, as long as the source mentions an official site. In Summer, after part one of Series 6 is air, then we may discuss the references then. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 16:27, March 29, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Hardly, I just removed a bunch of references from the cast section. You could undo this and either find proper references or insert the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> template. Obviously the latter would be a bit stupid but you can't just leave these references in; they directly defy policy.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:38, March 29, 2011 (UTC) | |||
