User talk:Whoisdrwho: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Line 77: Line 77:
To reiterate, '''I find your edits at [[Series 6 (Doctor Who)]] to have been helpful, well-intentioned, and perfectly proper.''' Where you went wrong was in thinking that Revan had something personal against you.  As I've demonstrated by careful review of your edits, '''series 6 is the ''only'' place where he's directly contradicted your edits.'''  And I'm convinced he was acting in what he believed was good faith, as were you.
To reiterate, '''I find your edits at [[Series 6 (Doctor Who)]] to have been helpful, well-intentioned, and perfectly proper.''' Where you went wrong was in thinking that Revan had something personal against you.  As I've demonstrated by careful review of your edits, '''series 6 is the ''only'' place where he's directly contradicted your edits.'''  And I'm convinced he was acting in what he believed was good faith, as were you.


There's simply been a misunerstanding here.  That might be because the only time you spoke with him directly was when you were convinced he was stalking him.  If you had explained your editing on his talk page, which you never really did, I feel sure that you would have found Revan reasonable, and you would have worked to a common goal.  After all, he demonstrated on his [[Roswell]] / [[Roswell crash]] edits that he was listening to your issues.  Try to remember in future that while revision notes (the summaries that you include before you save your articles) are things that should be included, they aren't a terribly effective way of carrying on a conversation with someone.  So while you did leave notes in the history, it's entirely possible that Revan never saw them.  Far better to leave emssages directly on user or article talk pages.
There's simply been a misunerstanding here.  That might be because the only time you spoke with him directly was when you were convinced he was stalking you.  If you had explained your editing on his talk page, which you never really did, I feel sure that you would have found Revan reasonable, and you would have worked to a common goal.  After all, he demonstrated on his [[Roswell]] / [[Roswell crash]] edits that he was listening to your issues.  Try to remember in future that while revision notes (the summaries that you include before you save your articles) are things that should be included, they aren't a terribly effective way of carrying on a conversation with someone.  So while you did leave notes in the history, it's entirely possible that Revan never saw them.  Far better to leave emssages directly on user or article talk pages.


I noticed while I was typing this that you blanked your talk page and appear to have left our community.  I reverted your talk page, in part because you technically don't have a right to do delete discussions on this wiki, but mostly because I hope you'll decide to come back.  Your edits have been generally good ones so far.  We could certainly use you in the future, especially as the new series begins.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''18:38:33 Fri&nbsp;'''01 Apr 2011&nbsp;</span>
I noticed while I was typing this that you blanked your talk page and appear to have left our community.  I reverted your talk page, in part because you technically don't have a right to delete discussions on this wiki, but mostly because I hope you'll decide to come back.  Your edits have been generally good ones so far.  We could certainly use you in the future, especially as the new series begins.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''18:38:33 Fri&nbsp;'''01 Apr 2011&nbsp;</span>
85,404

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.