Howling:The Little Girl's True Identity: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:
:    Matt keeps calling her Karen because that's the name of Amy's actor. He's probably just used to
:    Matt keeps calling her Karen because that's the name of Amy's actor. He's probably just used to
:    calling her that :) Sorry if it's just a joke that flew over my head. [[Special:Contributions/82.23.86.126|82.23.86.126]] 19:21, May 13, 2011 (UTC)Ghadius
:    calling her that :) Sorry if it's just a joke that flew over my head. [[Special:Contributions/82.23.86.126|82.23.86.126]] 19:21, May 13, 2011 (UTC)Ghadius
:
:    Yes, it was a joke. Who would seriously wish for Karen Gillan to regenerate into a different body than the one she has now? :) He also says the game is rubbish when you're playing Karen, and great when you're playing the Doctor, which is pretty funny. --[[Special:Contributions/99.33.25.110|99.33.25.110]] 13:53, May 15, 2011 (UTC)


I think the little girl is a child of The Doctor and River. Weird theory, but makes sense. There are parts that don't, (For example, River would already know who the girl was if they do meet in reverse order all the time) but I can bet she isn't Amy.
I think the little girl is a child of The Doctor and River. Weird theory, but makes sense. There are parts that don't, (For example, River would already know who the girl was if they do meet in reverse order all the time) but I can bet she isn't Amy.
Line 39: Line 41:


<p style="margin-left: 40px">"(e.g., in the novels, hybrids with Time Lord mothers are human, while hybrids with Time Lord fathers are Gallifreyan)". Sounds rather contradictory to me. [[Special:Contributions/184.160.209.204|184.160.209.204]] 20:23, May 14, 2011 (UTC)</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">"(e.g., in the novels, hybrids with Time Lord mothers are human, while hybrids with Time Lord fathers are Gallifreyan)". Sounds rather contradictory to me. [[Special:Contributions/184.160.209.204|184.160.209.204]] 20:23, May 14, 2011 (UTC)</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">Not really. You're only a hereditary noble if your father was one, or you're only a Jew if your mother was one, so why can't you only be a Gallifreyan if your father was one?</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">Of course this is a biological difference (two hearts, etc.) rather than a social convention--but if the Rassilon Impramatur and his other genetic engineering were sex-linked (and remember, he was slightly paranoid, and was overthrowing an oppressive matriarchy at the time), that still works.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">Anyway, as far as I know, there are multiple cases of Time Lord/human woman children (Andred-Leela and Ulysses-Penelope, most notably), and they all were Gallifreyan, but the only case I know of the other way around (David Campbell and Susan Foreman's son Alex) turned out to only have one heart.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">Of course these stories all contradict other stories--.e.g., Legacy of the Daleks says Susan was sterile, and reading Lungbarrow and The Gallifrey Chronicles, it seems to imply that the Curse of Pythia was just sterilizing Time Ladies, not Time Lords. If Time Ladies can't have babies, the question of whether they'd be Time Tots is unanswerable. --[[Special:Contributions/99.33.25.110|99.33.25.110]] 13:53, May 15, 2011 (UTC)</p>
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.