Forum:Canonicity of Dalek Annuals: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Panopticon}}
{{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:inclusion debates]]
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
I have access to the Dalek Annuals and similar publications and while I have come across some contradictory information (in terms as it has been changed), the rest of it I am hesitant to source as I am not sure if the old annuals are considered canonical.  Are they?  [[User:Trak Nar|<b><span style="color: Chocolate">Trak Nar</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Trak Nar|Ramble on]]</sup> 06:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
I have access to the Dalek Annuals and similar publications and while I have come across some contradictory information (in terms as it has been changed), the rest of it I am hesitant to source as I am not sure if the old annuals are considered canonical.  Are they?  [[User:Trak Nar|<b><span style="color: Chocolate">Trak Nar</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:Trak Nar|Ramble on]]</sup> 06:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
85,404

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.