Forum:Pointless/redundant wikiing: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forum archives header|Panopticon archives}}[[category:failed proposals]]
{{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:failed proposals]]
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->


Line 10: Line 10:
:I'm not sure there is (but thank you! I thought I was the only one staring at some of the things and thinking 'huh'?). I guess it's more a judgement call than anything really concrete. There have been a few things in the forum here and there. In the Manual of Style there's a section on [[Tardis:Manual of style#Links|Links]] but that's about it. Maybe it could be changed to Links/Wikifying, just to clarify it up a bit and then add...well something about justifyable use of a link or...something like that. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
:I'm not sure there is (but thank you! I thought I was the only one staring at some of the things and thinking 'huh'?). I guess it's more a judgement call than anything really concrete. There have been a few things in the forum here and there. In the Manual of Style there's a section on [[Tardis:Manual of style#Links|Links]] but that's about it. Maybe it could be changed to Links/Wikifying, just to clarify it up a bit and then add...well something about justifyable use of a link or...something like that. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


::Well, the problem is that you never know when references might pop up. For example, I wouldn't think that [[ABBA]] would have anything to do with Doctor Who, but there's a reference there already and I've found another one in ''[[Tragedy Day]]''.
::Well, the problem is that you never know when references might pop up. For example, I wouldn't think that [[ABBA]] would have anything to do with Doctor Who, but there's a reference there already and I've found another one in ''[[Tragedy Day (novel)|Tragedy Day]]''.
::Personally, I only make wiki-link when there's already links to it or if I plan to make that page later. [[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 16:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
::Personally, I only make wiki-link when there's already links to it or if I plan to make that page later. [[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 16:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


Line 17: Line 17:
This discussion never really came to a clear conclusion.  The idea of there being an "article too small" for inclusion was roundly defeated, however, at [[Talk:Howling Halls/Archive 1]].  Current policy is that any word may be wikified, and any article may be created, so long as the word is mentioned ''somewhere'' in a source the wiki considers valid.  
This discussion never really came to a clear conclusion.  The idea of there being an "article too small" for inclusion was roundly defeated, however, at [[Talk:Howling Halls/Archive 1]].  Current policy is that any word may be wikified, and any article may be created, so long as the word is mentioned ''somewhere'' in a source the wiki considers valid.  


Therefore, this thread is best thought of as a failed proposal. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''15:11:08 Wed&nbsp;'''01 Jun 2011&nbsp;</span>
Therefore, this thread is best thought of as a failed proposal. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''15:11:08 Wed&nbsp;'''01 Jun 2011&nbsp;</span>
Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
153,401

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.