Howling:Doc Murders a Ganger: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:
I get that Amy's 'ganger was different to the autonomous 'gangers that were the subject of the episode.  It is clearly shown though that discarded non autonomous 'gangers left to decompose slowly is something that is of concern to the Doctor. These corpses are shown to have some form of response and movement (however minimal).  Therefore it suggests that the flesh is somewhat alive over and above the interaction of the user.  So the Doctor did kill something, even if it was only like moss.  However I don't see this as any different to the Doctor's previous behaviour.  Remember in the Beast Below he was willing to destroy the mind of the space whale to protect "Britain".  In this case, either Amy must remain trapped, or the flesh that is Amy's 'Ganger will suffer a long death.  This is the most kind response for the flesh, under the circumstances.--[[User:Lambr5|Lambr5]] 18:36, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
I get that Amy's 'ganger was different to the autonomous 'gangers that were the subject of the episode.  It is clearly shown though that discarded non autonomous 'gangers left to decompose slowly is something that is of concern to the Doctor. These corpses are shown to have some form of response and movement (however minimal).  Therefore it suggests that the flesh is somewhat alive over and above the interaction of the user.  So the Doctor did kill something, even if it was only like moss.  However I don't see this as any different to the Doctor's previous behaviour.  Remember in the Beast Below he was willing to destroy the mind of the space whale to protect "Britain".  In this case, either Amy must remain trapped, or the flesh that is Amy's 'Ganger will suffer a long death.  This is the most kind response for the flesh, under the circumstances.--[[User:Lambr5|Lambr5]] 18:36, June 2, 2011 (UTC)


:Honestly, I'm over it. I'm now in the camp which says "this will probably be totally satisfactory after the wash, but they sure could have handled it a lot better in the meantime."  That, and, I still say the guest characters' motivations were some of the worst writing I've ever seen in Who... which is what predisposed me to hate whatever they were going to put in front of me for a finish. [[User:Agonaga|Agonaga]] 18:39, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
:Honestly, I'm over it. I'm now in the camp which says "this will probably be totally satisfactory after the wash, but they sure could have handled it a lot better in the meantime."  That, and, I still say the guest characters' motivations were some of the worst writing I've ever seen in Who... which is what predisposed me to hate whatever they were going to put in front of me for a finish.  The fact that an episode with such pizzle-poor writing, ended with pizzle-poor writing, has finally stopped holding any fascination for me. [[User:Agonaga|Agonaga]] 18:39, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
165

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.