49,076
edits
Talk:Order of the Headless: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Mentions?
(Just adding the talk section) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Mentions are allowed. [[User:Bold Clone]] reverted the mention as he didn't recall it, and then again as there isn't actually a mentioned section '''in the infobox'''. The mention is still, well, mentioned in the article body.----<u>[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small></u> 19:09, June 20, 2011 (UTC) | Mentions are allowed. [[User:Bold Clone]] reverted the mention as he didn't recall it, and then again as there isn't actually a mentioned section '''in the infobox'''. The mention is still, well, mentioned in the article body.----<u>[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small></u> 19:09, June 20, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Okay, so it's just some poor editor explanation then; thanks for clearing that up. - | Okay, so it's just some poor editor explanation then; thanks for clearing that up. - Would I be right in assuming that the reason for not having a 'mentions' section in the infobox (when they are in other pages) would be the relative 'lack of mentions' up to this point? [[User:Baziel|Baziel]] 19:35, June 20, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:What was poor about my explanation? I removed the info because I wasn't sure if they had actually been mentioned. Then, after it was confirmed that they had been mentioned, I removed the info again because there wasn't a "mentioned" section. It seems to me that it was more like some poor double-checking of the facts--you didn't know that the template didn't have a "mentioned" section. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 19:41, June 20, 2011 (UTC) | :What was poor about my explanation? I removed the info because I wasn't sure if they had actually been mentioned. Then, after it was confirmed that they had been mentioned, I removed the info again because there wasn't a "mentioned" section. It seems to me that it was more like some poor double-checking of the facts--you didn't know that the template didn't have a "mentioned" section. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 19:41, June 20, 2011 (UTC) | ||
: | |||
:It's mentioned now in the history sections, which looks like a fine place for it. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] 19:57, June 20, 2011 (UTC) | |||
