emailconfirmed, Administrators
43,565
edits
User talk:Skittles the hog/Archive 6: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
(Created page with "{|align="right" style="text-align: center; border: solid 1px #CCC; margin: 20px; padding: 5px;" |<center>50px</center> |- | '''[[User talk:Ski...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 444: | Line 444: | ||
I need this file deleted immediantly and temporarily. There is so much noise in the bottom left of the image, that I'm trying to clean up, but isn't really doing it. Delete it temporarily, and I will re-upload it. Reply desperately needed. [[User:BroadcastCorp.|BroadcastCorp.]] 16:22, July 26, 2011 (UTC) | I need this file deleted immediantly and temporarily. There is so much noise in the bottom left of the image, that I'm trying to clean up, but isn't really doing it. Delete it temporarily, and I will re-upload it. Reply desperately needed. [[User:BroadcastCorp.|BroadcastCorp.]] 16:22, July 26, 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Zamper (planet) > Zamper, Zamper > Zamper (novel) == | |||
Done. Though this kind of move is happening with enough regularity that we should just go ahead and disambiguate all story names. It'd make life so much easier to do it once and get it over with. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''20:29:24 Tue '''26 Jul 2011 </span> | |||
== Other Doctor Who Wikis == | |||
I found this wiki: http://daleksrus.wikia.com/wiki/Dr_Who_Wiki - rubbish compared to our wiki - on the internet. Why is there another Doctor Who Wiki. Should we ask them to discontinue their wiki and come over to us? [[User:BroadcastCorp.|BroadcastCorp.]] 10:11, July 27, 2011 (UTC) | |||
:It is quite pathetic though. We are so much superior than them. [[User:BroadcastCorp.|BroadcastCorp.]] 15:57, July 27, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Silurian talk page == | |||
I added another comment. You may want to take a look. [[User:BroadcastCorp.|BroadcastCorp.]] 15:54, July 27, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Utopia! == | |||
I'm so sorry I didn't make myself clear! I meant the TV story Utopia, not the planet Utopia. [[User:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] 15:21, July 28, 2011 (UTC) | |||
I've made this article perfect! Not a single dead link. No ''"to be added''". Do you think it could be the featured article in [[August]]? | |||
I've cleaned up that article's Continuity section. What do you mean by lead though? [[User:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] 16:28, July 28, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Long Lead == | |||
We don't need a long one. The current lead to [[Utopia (TV story)]] is just fine. Look at the current featured article ([[The Big Bang]], it has a very short lead, and yet it is a featured article. Just one question: Would you vote for [[Utopia (TV story)]] as the featured article for next month coming? I have worked very hard on it. [[User:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] 10:36, July 29, 2011 (UTC) | |||
I wrote another paragraph for the lead. Why don't you try and write more? You may enjoy it. [[User:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] 10:49, July 29, 2011 (UTC) | |||
So I have to wait for another month? [[User:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] 11:06, July 29, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== The Big Bang as a featured article? == | |||
This is ridiculous. It is so messy. And it's lead is too short. Why is it a featured article? [[User:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] 11:08, July 29, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Right... == | |||
So, if ''[[Utopia]]'' cannot be the featured article next month, how about [[DW]]: ''[[The End of Time]]''? It's a brilliant article, one of my favourites. It has a long lead, and few red links. So... what do you think? Featured article? [[User:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] 11:14, July 29, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Perhaps we could change that stupid, pathetic system. After all, you are an administrator... [[User:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] 11:18, July 29, 2011 (UTC) | |||
