33,205
edits
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
:: i fully agree with you, I spent some time creating, editing pages and category for the years from 1600-1699 and the later 17th century categories. I moved everything from the "17th century" page to a page for the year that that events happened, only to be pulled up for it and to be told to stop. I ask the User who did so to starts a discussion, or to wait until I had to see if they will be deleted or no a they went behind my back and deleted them anyway. Its annoying and upsetting that it happened. I fully vote to restore these pages back as there were and create the proper pages for the years. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 20:00, August 2, 2011 (UTC) | :: i fully agree with you, I spent some time creating, editing pages and category for the years from 1600-1699 and the later 17th century categories. I moved everything from the "17th century" page to a page for the year that that events happened, only to be pulled up for it and to be told to stop. I ask the User who did so to starts a discussion, or to wait until I had to see if they will be deleted or no a they went behind my back and deleted them anyway. Its annoying and upsetting that it happened. I fully vote to restore these pages back as there were and create the proper pages for the years. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 20:00, August 2, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::To answer TD, yes, we should restore the pages deleted. I don't have any problem with, say, [[15th century]] remaining as it is, however. It can stay a year-by-year listing of events in the DWU. But the individual year pages should definitely be recreated. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''12:55:31 Fri '''05 Aug 2011 </span> | :::To answer TD, yes, we should restore the pages deleted. I don't have any problem with, say, [[15th century]] remaining as it is, however. It can stay a year-by-year listing of events in the DWU. But the individual year pages should definitely be recreated. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''12:55:31 Fri '''05 Aug 2011 </span> | ||
::::I'm happy to start this, the only thing I think we need to do is see what other User's think of the matter, and I;m interested to see what [[User:Doug86]] has to say, since he is against this initial idea. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 12:59, August 6, 2011 (UTC) |
edits