Forum:A second look at wiki achivements: Difference between revisions

Forum:A second look at wiki achivements (edit)

191 bytes added , 22 August 2011

Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators

35,119

edits

Revision as of 17:12, 22 August 2011 (edit) Skittles the hog (talk \| contribs) (→‎Discussion) ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:13, 22 August 2011 (edit) (undo) Revanvolatrelundar (talk \| contribs) (→‎Discussion) Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	If you think being in the top ten is worth suffering such a gimmicky feature, go for it. Personally, I don't think being in the top ten wikis is of any importance whatsoever. It's not a competition after all, despite what these "achievements" say.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:12, August 22, 2011 (UTC)		If you think being in the top ten is worth suffering such a gimmicky feature, go for it. Personally, I don't think being in the top ten wikis is of any importance whatsoever. It's not a competition after all, despite what these "achievements" say.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:12, August 22, 2011 (UTC)

			Sounds like its worth a try, I can't see any reason for it not to be a useful feature. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar\|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar\|Talk]] 17:13, August 22, 2011 (UTC)