Forum:River Song incarnations or full page?: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 15: Line 15:


Yes, but if you take [[Rassilon]] for example, the article works fine as a single page. All the information is still there, and it doesn't exactly take long to find what your looking for.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:20, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
Yes, but if you take [[Rassilon]] for example, the article works fine as a single page. All the information is still there, and it doesn't exactly take long to find what your looking for.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:20, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
:I personally think I would prefer one page, since neither of the other incarnations are particularly large in article length, so would be easily integrated to River's page, however I wouldn't object to three different pages. And also on that note, should we not discuss the naming of the pages? Because right now the River Song incarnation is "Melody Pond (River Song)", but I think it should be simply "River Song". Just like Amy's is titled "Amy Pond" instead of "Amelia Pond" because that's what she is known as most. River is most known as River, even if her birth name is Melody Pond.
:So, if it is to be three pages they should be named after their most known name. The little girl should simply be Melody Pond, Mels should be Mels and River Song should be River Song, as that's what they're all called, not Melody Pond (Spacesuit)/(Mels)/(River Song) which looks rather messy as the page title. If it's one page, then I suggest simply River Song, as that's the name she has been known by most with Melody Pond and Mels being redirects. --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 18:24, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.