54
edits
Forum:River Song incarnations or full page?: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:River Song incarnations or full page? (edit)
Revision as of 09:08, 1 September 2011
, 1 September 2011→Further discussion: Appeal
No edit summary |
(→Further discussion: Appeal) |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
===Further discussion=== | ===Further discussion=== | ||
to be added | Since this heading is here, I'd like to utilize it. I completely and strongly disagree with this decision, and I'd like to appeal it. The article is quite a long page for an average article, and it needs to be split up. The seperate articles look far neater then having all of the information crammed into one article. Melody Pond is a major character in the revised series of Doctor Who, having been a reccuring character for four years on Doctor Who, I belive that she is important enough to warrant an article for each of her regenerations. Each incarnation has more than enough information to become an entire article, and cramming it all into [[River Song]] is not the right way to handle this. | ||
I had been working on [[Melody Pond (Mels)]] before it was deleted, and I have to say it was of a decent length, with more information to be added. I also noticed, that none of the information from [[Melody Pond (Mels)]] was copied to [[River Song]]. Why is this? I know for a fact that information was not copied, because it is information I wrote myself. | |||
[[River Song]] is in need of expansion, and it is hard to do this when the article is already quite long. The article is becoming messy, and it just looks unnatractive. All three incanations of Melody Pond should have their own articles on the wiki, as well as a 'home page', if you will, for a brief overview of the entire character's history. {{User:Rassilon of Old/Sig}} 09:08, September 1, 2011 (UTC) | |||
