Forum:River Song incarnations or full page?: Difference between revisions

Forum:River Song incarnations or full page? (edit)

446 bytes added , 1 September 2011

no edit summary

49,076

edits

Revision as of 13:46, 1 September 2011 (edit) Boblipton (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:51, 1 September 2011 (edit) (undo) Boblipton (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 67:		Line 67:

	Don't be hard on him, Tangerineduel. It's a credit in the IMDB and so probably wrong.[[User:Boblipton\|Boblipton]] 13:46, September 1, 2011 (UTC)		Don't be hard on him, Tangerineduel. It's a credit in the IMDB and so probably wrong.[[User:Boblipton\|Boblipton]] 13:46, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

			Oh, and while I'm still mildly opposed to splitting up the article (my original comments way at the tippy-top are still how I feel), I think that the difficulty of naming the new pages is oversold. If they're restored in a fit of waffling, the names will be set, there will be a lot of howling that they're wrong and anyone who doesn't think so is an idiot and matters will settle out.[[User:Boblipton\|Boblipton]] 13:51, September 1, 2011 (UTC)