Forum:River Song incarnations or full page?: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:River Song incarnations or full page? (edit)
Revision as of 03:49, 2 September 2011
, 2 September 2011no edit summary
Icecreamdif (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Right now there's really no need to give Melody multiple articles. There is one incarnation who has appeared in a handful of stories, and two other incarnations who have appeared in one story each. River will probably continue to appear in stories for years, but it will most likely just be the one incarnation anyway with maybe a flashback or two to the other two. At present, there isn't really enough information to make it worth adding more pages. Also, Rassilon of Old, you wouldn't have understood the aon's references even if you had seen the classic series. He's talking about the other spin-off media. All of the clasic series Masters do have articles, and most of them appeared in many episodes(although [[The Master (Tersurus)]] was only in two episodes, but that page's existance seems to be under debate now anyway).[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 23:48, September 1, 2011 (UTC) | Right now there's really no need to give Melody multiple articles. There is one incarnation who has appeared in a handful of stories, and two other incarnations who have appeared in one story each. River will probably continue to appear in stories for years, but it will most likely just be the one incarnation anyway with maybe a flashback or two to the other two. At present, there isn't really enough information to make it worth adding more pages. Also, Rassilon of Old, you wouldn't have understood the aon's references even if you had seen the classic series. He's talking about the other spin-off media. All of the clasic series Masters do have articles, and most of them appeared in many episodes(although [[The Master (Tersurus)]] was only in two episodes, but that page's existance seems to be under debate now anyway).[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 23:48, September 1, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I think everyone bug Rassilon of Old agrees here, so what we need for a consensus is to find out what he thinks is missing from a single page, and whether we can get what he wants without splitting the page. So here's a suggestion: Rassilon, add all the Mels information you want to the existing River article. If people complain that it's too long or unwieldy (or if they just chop it out without commenting on the Talk page), that's good evidence that it needs its own article. Ask friends who aren't that familiar with this wiki to find information about Mels on the article; if they have a problem finding it, that's good evidence too. If something like that happens, you'll probably be able to sell everyone else on splitting her off. If it doesn't, maybe you'll realize you're happy with the single-page result. | |||
:As for the Master: Well, you surely know his little-boy form from ''Last of the Time Lords'' and ''The End of Time'', and possibly the deathworm from the TV movie, who also don't have articles. Anyway, the point is this: Just because Harold Saxon needs a separate page doesn't mean the little boy needs a separate page, and, in the same way, even if Mels turns out to need a separate page, that doesn't mean the little girl does too. --[[Special:Contributions/173.228.85.35|173.228.85.35]] 03:49, September 2, 2011 (UTC) | |||
