1,805
edits
Talk:Immortality: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Icecreamdif (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Should Owen really be listed as being immortal? The page defines immortality as the ability to live forever, and that's kind of the opposite of what happenned to Owen, isn't it. ...") |
Icecreamdif (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should Owen really be listed as being immortal? The page defines immortality as the ability to live forever, and that's kind of the opposite of what happenned to Owen, isn't it. Apart from that, we know that Owen was able to die before long, and Martha said that she didn't know how long he would stay "alive". The entire time he was undead, he was at risk of dropping dead at any moment.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 17:49, September 3, 2011 (UTC) | Should Owen really be listed as being immortal? The page defines immortality as the ability to live forever, and that's kind of the opposite of what happenned to Owen, isn't it. Apart from that, we know that Owen was able to die before long, and Martha said that she didn't know how long he would stay "alive". The entire time he was undead, he was at risk of dropping dead at any moment.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 17:49, September 3, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Why is it that suddenly no topic can be represented with just one main picture. Apart from the fact that regeneration isn't immortality(and the regeneration in that picture didn't go so well), the concept of imomortality can really be represented with just one picture. I would keep the picture of Jack as the main image since he is pretty much the only thing that's truly immortal (Cybermen can die and we can assume the Miracle will end on Friday), and then the Cybermen and suicide bomber images can be put in the body of the article.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 20:33, September 6, 2011 (UTC) | |||
