emailconfirmed, Administrators
43,565
edits
Forum:"Mentions" field being deactivated: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:"Mentions" field being deactivated (edit)
Revision as of 06:57, 28 September 2011
, 28 September 2011no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} | {{Forumheader|Panopticon}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Some articles seem to have "mentions" fields in their infoboxes that are becoming somewhat unruly. Instead of having "list of mentions", could we incorporate them into list of appearances pages? I know | Some articles seem to have "mentions" fields in their infoboxes that are becoming somewhat unruly. Instead of having "list of mentions", could we incorporate them into list of appearances pages? I know we don't actually have list of mentions pages, but articles like [[Dalek]] clearly need to dump them somewhere.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 19:31, September 20, 2011 (UTC) | ||
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">Even for minor characters, where the list isn't very long, I think that's a good idea. For example, look at [[Kamelion]]. If you want to find out his first appearances, you have to follow a link to another page, but if you want to know which CC had a brief indirect reference to him, it's right there in the infobox?</p> | <p style="margin-left: 40px; ">Even for minor characters, where the list isn't very long, I think that's a good idea. For example, look at [[Kamelion]]. If you want to find out his first appearances, you have to follow a link to another page, but if you want to know which CC had a brief indirect reference to him, it's right there in the infobox?</p> | ||
