Forum:We need a policy on videogames: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 71: Line 71:
Given the level of detail in the recent ''Adventure Games'' I'm going to step back from including them as a secondary source, as their info is fairly detailed at times and there are several articles using a video game as their only source, mostly character articles, and some like [[Kaalann]]. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:07, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
Given the level of detail in the recent ''Adventure Games'' I'm going to step back from including them as a secondary source, as their info is fairly detailed at times and there are several articles using a video game as their only source, mostly character articles, and some like [[Kaalann]]. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:07, August 21, 2010 (UTC)


:A good measuring stick for games-as-canon might be the involvement of the BBC and the ''Doctor Who'' production team. Like FASA's output, things like ''[[Dalek Attack]]'' and ''[[Doctor Who and the Mines of Terror]]'' were created entirely by outside companies who merely secured the BBC licence and did their own thing with it; their work fits into the category of ''Doctor Who'' merchandise, but is no more relevant to canon than Dalek bubble bath. On the other hand, ''[[Doctor Who: The Adventure Games]]'' were produced with the involvement of [[BBC Wales Interactive]] and executive-produced by [[Steven Moffat]], [[Beth Willis]], and [[Piers Wenger]].  ''[[Attack of the Graske]]'' was made by [[BBC Wales]].  While there wasn't a ''Doctor Who'' production team at the time, ''[[Doctor Who: Destiny of the Doctors]]'' was co-developed and published by [[BBC Multimedia]].  These were all created with an eye toward fitting into the [[Doctor Who universe]] by those in control of the DWU.  This might be a simple way for us to divide the canon-capable games from the others. — [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] - '''[[User talk:Rob T Firefly|Δ]][[Special:Contributions/Rob T Firefly|∇]]''' - 04:24, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
:A good measuring stick for games-as-canon might be the involvement of the BBC and the ''Doctor Who'' production team.
 
:Like FASA's output, things like ''[[Dalek Attack]]'' and ''[[Doctor Who and the Mines of Terror]]'' were created entirely by outside companies who merely secured the BBC licence and did their own thing with it; their work fits into the category of ''Doctor Who'' merchandise, but is no more relevant to canon than Dalek bubble bath.
 
:On the other hand, ''[[Doctor Who: The Adventure Games]]'' were produced with the involvement of [[BBC Wales Interactive]] and executive-produced by [[Steven Moffat]], [[Beth Willis]], and [[Piers Wenger]], and star [[Matt Smith]] and company.  ''[[Attack of the Graske]]'' was made by [[BBC Wales]], and starred [[David Tennant]].  While there wasn't a ''Doctor Who'' production team at the time, ''[[Doctor Who: Destiny of the Doctors]]'' was co-developed and published by [[BBC Multimedia]], and starred [[Anthony Ainley]] and a handful of Doctors.  These were all created with an eye toward fitting into the [[Doctor Who universe]] - or at least not screwing with it ''too'' badly - by those in control of the DWU.  This might be a simple way for us to divide the canon-capable games from the others. — [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] - '''[[User talk:Rob T Firefly|Δ]][[Special:Contributions/Rob T Firefly|∇]]''' - 04:24, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
9,297

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.