49,076
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Icecreamdif: All correct. Without the Doctor's impact, the universe would have been destroyed by something else, but not by the cracks. The (limited) point I was making above was that the cracks couldn't erase the Doctor's impact without causing a paradox, because they were '''part '''of his impact. If they'd erased the impact of those whose existence they erased, they couldn't have erased the Doctor at all. --[[Special:Contributions/2.101.58.9|2.101.58.9]] (formerly 89.240.241.19) 21:22, October 19, 2011 (UTC) | Icecreamdif: All correct. Without the Doctor's impact, the universe would have been destroyed by something else, but not by the cracks. The (limited) point I was making above was that the cracks couldn't erase the Doctor's impact without causing a paradox, because they were '''part '''of his impact. If they'd erased the impact of those whose existence they erased, they couldn't have erased the Doctor at all. --[[Special:Contributions/2.101.58.9|2.101.58.9]] (formerly 89.240.241.19) 21:22, October 19, 2011 (UTC) | ||
And my point is what Doctor? He never existed. Just because we haven't figured out how all these things happened doesn't mean they don't have a logical explanation. Given any set of facts you can come up with a logical system to explain them. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] <sup>[[User talk:Boblipton|talk to me]]</sup> 01:46, October 20, 2011 (UTC) |
edits