765,429
edits
Forum:Disambiguation case study: Wish You Were Here: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Disambiguation case study: Wish You Were Here (edit)
Revision as of 20:17, 22 October 2011
, 22 October 2011standard dab
No edit summary |
m (standard dab) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*Nope, I'm correctly using the word format. Surely people are more likely to know whether they read a story online or on paper.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 19:43, March 17, 2011 (UTC) | *Nope, I'm correctly using the word format. Surely people are more likely to know whether they read a story online or on paper.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 19:43, March 17, 2011 (UTC) | ||
::I still agree with Skittles. For CzechOut's scenario the policy would just read: ''In the unlikely event that two (or more) short stories of the same name exist place the prefix the short story belongs to in the disambig brackets.'' So ''Story name (DWA short story)'' ''Story name (VD short story)''. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:39, March 18, 2011 (UTC) | ::I still agree with Skittles. For CzechOut's scenario the policy would just read: ''In the unlikely event that two (or more) short stories of the same name exist place the prefix the short story belongs to in the disambig brackets.'' So ''Story name (DWA short story)'' ''Story name (VD short story)''. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:39, March 18, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::So, what's wrong with that nomenclature? It's not in the poll, but I think there's some elegance to that. It really should be <range prefix> + <story type>. After all, we currently disambiguate [[Twilight of the Gods (BNA)]] and [[Twilight of the Gods (MA)]]. Add "novel" to those, and I think we've got a naming convention that's consistent and logical. In this case, it should be: | :::So, what's wrong with that nomenclature? It's not in the poll, but I think there's some elegance to that. It really should be <range prefix> + <story type>. After all, we currently disambiguate [[Twilight of the Gods (BNA novel)]] and [[Twilight of the Gods (MA)]]. Add "novel" to those, and I think we've got a naming convention that's consistent and logical. In this case, it should be: | ||
:::*Wishing You Were Here (WEB short story) | :::*Wishing You Were Here (WEB short story) | ||
:::*Wishing You Were Here (ST short story). | :::*Wishing You Were Here (ST short story). | ||
:::Anyone opposed to that? {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">23:31: Thu 13 Oct 2011 </span> | :::Anyone opposed to that? {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">23:31: Thu 13 Oct 2011 </span> | ||
:::: I think that works. Seems to be more consistent than others of the like than using "print" to describe the Short Trip at the very least. "Wish You Were Here (ST short story)" and "Wish You Were Here (web short story)"? -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 11:30, October 14, 2011 (UTC) | :::: I think that works. Seems to be more consistent than others of the like than using "print" to describe the Short Trip at the very least. "Wish You Were Here (ST short story)" and "Wish You Were Here (web short story)"? -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 11:30, October 14, 2011 (UTC) | ||
