Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Forum:Appearances in various media.: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[Category:failed proposals]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
:::::::I do think we need consistency across articles otherwise we'd need a note that states 'appearance in publishing order/in chronological appearance'. | :::::::I do think we need consistency across articles otherwise we'd need a note that states 'appearance in publishing order/in chronological appearance'. | ||
:::::::In the individual infobox it says '''appearances''', mentions shouldn't be anywhere in that. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:38, June 10, 2010 (UTC) | :::::::In the individual infobox it says '''appearances''', mentions shouldn't be anywhere in that. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:38, June 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Archivist's notes== | |||
This doesn't seem to have actually been taken up as any kind of policy. Certainly, it doesn't seem to be in use on pages in any kind of consistent way. So this is one of those proposals that have failed from disuse, even though there's an argument which seems to have been discussed and well articulated. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">16:15: Sun 06 Nov 2011 </span> | |||
