49,076
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
"It would be a poor explanation if it were an explanation but is isn't - it's an effect that has not (yet) been explained." Somehow, I can't see the writers explaining this conundrum any time in the foreseeable future, can you? It's most likely going to remain a huge narrative nightmare. [[Special:Contributions/82.2.136.93|82.2.136.93]] 19:21, November 28, 2011 (UTC) | "It would be a poor explanation if it were an explanation but is isn't - it's an effect that has not (yet) been explained." Somehow, I can't see the writers explaining this conundrum any time in the foreseeable future, can you? It's most likely going to remain a huge narrative nightmare. [[Special:Contributions/82.2.136.93|82.2.136.93]] 19:21, November 28, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Actually, 82, that's just how Roger Zelazny turned out all those classic novellas. Left all the backstory alone and told what was happening at the moment. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] <sup>[[User talk:Boblipton|talk to me]]</sup> 19:25, November 28, 2011 (UTC) |
edits