496
edits
Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/The Big Bang: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/The Big Bang (edit)
Revision as of 20:09, 4 February 2012
, 4 February 2012How River got to the wedding in 2010
No edit summary |
(How River got to the wedding in 2010) |
||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
:River Song had been in June 26 2010 immediately prior to the destruction of the universe, so that was the state which was restored by the Pandorica when it recreated the universe. | :River Song had been in June 26 2010 immediately prior to the destruction of the universe, so that was the state which was restored by the Pandorica when it recreated the universe. | ||
:But she had the vortex manipulator later on, didn't she? Please remember that time travel can go backwards as well as forwards, and River probably doesn't have as much concern for the integrity of the timeline as the Doctor. | :But she had the vortex manipulator later on, didn't she? Please remember that time travel can go backwards as well as forwards, and River probably doesn't have as much concern for the integrity of the timeline as the Doctor. | ||
:I asked Steven Moffat on Twitter. Apparently she jumped through a stain glass window on to a Space steam train and hijacked a Camel. It sounds like something she would do. | |||
*When Rory releases the Doctor from The Pandorica, the "light" clearly shines on a Dalek, and some other enemies in the alliance. why didn't they come back to life - the Doctor and Rory were clearly there for long enough for something to awaken, and when they brought Amy's body. | *When Rory releases the Doctor from The Pandorica, the "light" clearly shines on a Dalek, and some other enemies in the alliance. why didn't they come back to life - the Doctor and Rory were clearly there for long enough for something to awaken, and when they brought Amy's body. | ||
