Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Category:Individuals by association: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Category:Individuals by association (edit)
Revision as of 15:52, 14 February 2012
, 14 February 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* '''religious leaders and members''', who are at [[:category:religious leaders]], and [[:Category:Human religion members]], amongst other places | * '''religious leaders and members''', who are at [[:category:religious leaders]], and [[:Category:Human religion members]], amongst other places | ||
Also note that [[Forum:What makes an ally and an enemy?|forum consensus]] has determined that being someone's "enemy" or "ally" or "friend" or "adversary" — or anything similar to that — is far too vague an "association" to be categorised. Thus, the categories of association must be specific and indisputable. | Also note that [[Forum:What makes an ally and an enemy?|forum consensus]] has determined that being someone's "enemy" or "ally" or "friend" or "adversary" — or anything similar to that — is far too vague an "association" to be categorised. Thus, the categories of association must be specific and indisputable. The exception to this is the title of "companion", which is vague, but is far too embedded in DW fandom to try to deny. Basically, we accept that ''Doctor Who'' fans — and our editors are, after all, fans — will always try to categorise characters by the word "companion", even though there is no in-universe definition of that term, and people therefore always disagree about who "counts" as a companion. | ||
[[Category:Individuals]] | [[Category:Individuals]] | ||
