Talk:Genderfluid

Noun

I don't see a problem with this page existing personally, but to adhere to the rules here, we would simply rename it 'Genderfluidity'. We are an encyclopaedia about everything that gets mentioned or occurs in the DWU, there's nothing wrong with mentioning genderfluidity. TheFartyDoctor ^Talk 19:50, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

If it's mentioned in-universe, then it's ok as a noun. No one is to recreate "genderfluid". We can't just get around the no-adjective rule every time by claiming the adjective is jargon and therefore a noun. Shambala108 ☎ 20:30, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

I haven't read What Keeps Their Lines Alive, but there was a redlink with the exact phrase, so I'd assume it's at least mentioned. Also, it's not really jargon, it's an identity. Never Forget The Day The 456 Arrived ☎ 21:53, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

This was already deleted once. And I didn't say it was jargon, I said we can't recreate it by claiming it's jargon, as often happens with verbs or adjectives when someone wants to create them.

We do not make pages for adjectives, and if the noun doesn't currently exist in universe, surely it will at some point. The existing redlink isn't an excuse, because some people don't know the rules. Shambala108 ☎ 00:28, June 10, 2020 (UTC)